New York Attorney General Requests Sanctions Against Former President Trump in Lawsuit

LISTEN HERE:

New York Attorney General Letitia James is requesting a judge to impose sanctions on former President Donald Trump and his attorneys, citing what she perceives as ‘frivolous’ arguments in her civil lawsuit against him.

According to CNBC, James is seeking a collective fine of $10,000 on all defendants and an additional $10,000 fine on their lawyers for continually repeating failed legal arguments. In her lawsuit, James alleges that Trump and his adult children engaged in fraudulent activities, exaggerating the Trump Organization’s assets by billions of dollars since 2011.

The lawsuit aims to secure $250 million in damages and prevent Trump and his adult children from holding positions in New York-registered businesses as officers or directors.

During the ongoing legal proceedings, Ivanka Trump was removed from the case in June. In her recent filing, James points out that the defendants have consistently presented the same legal arguments against her lawsuit on five separate occasions since October.

She states that Judge Arthur Engoron has the authority to impose financial sanctions on any party or attorney involved in a civil action if they engage in frivolous conduct. James explains that conduct can be considered frivolous if it lacks legal merit or if its purpose is primarily to delay the resolution of the litigation.

Previously, Judge Engoron dismissed Trump’s claim that James lacked the standing to file the lawsuit, deeming it ‘borderline frivolous.’ Furthermore, a video montage released earlier this year could potentially undermine James’ case.

It showcases her campaign promise to bring down Trump should she be elected as New York Attorney General. Eric Trump shared the video on his Instagram page in January, expressing his concerns about James targeting political opponents and their families before even assuming office. He called it ‘third-world prosecutorial misconduct’ and criticized James as potentially becoming the most politically corrupt Attorney General in New York history.

Trump’s attorneys have also countered James’ allegations by asserting that the documents cited in her lawsuit do not contain any fraudulent information. They have requested the dismissal of the case based on this argument.

Letitia James, as New York Attorney General, is seeking justice through legal action against former President Donald Trump and his adult children. Her lawsuit accuses them of engaging in fraudulent activities over the past decade, influencing the Trump Organization’s reported assets.

The case aims to recover $250 million in damages and prevent the Trumps from holding executive positions in New York-registered businesses.

In recent filing, James highlighted the repetition of legal arguments by the defendants and their lawyers, requesting the judge to introduce financial sanctions as a consequence.

To James, these arguments lack legal merit and potentially serve to prolong the resolution of the litigation. She contends that Judge Arthur Engoron possesses the authority to enforce sanctions against parties or attorneys involved in civil cases.

Judge Engoron has previously dismissed Trump’s claim that James lacked the standing to file the lawsuit. This rejection marked the first time the defendants presented their arguments, and the judge deemed them ‘borderline frivolous.’

Additionally, a video montage released earlier this year has raised questions about James’ impartiality. In the video, James vows to take down Trump during her campaign for the Attorney General position, sparking concerns about her political motivations and potential bias.

The Trump legal team has challenged James’ claims by offering a different interpretation of the cited documents, asserting that they contain no evidence of fraudulent activity. They have consequently requested the dismissal of the lawsuit based on this lack of substantiation.

New York Attorney General Letitia James is taking legal action against former President Donald Trump and his adult children, alleging years of fraudulent practices that inflated the Trump Organization’s assets.

In addition to seeking $250 million in damages, James aims to restrict the Trumps from holding positions in New York-registered businesses. She argues that repeated failed legal arguments made by the defendants and their attorneys justify imposing financial sanctions.

James emphasizes that Judge Arthur Engoron possesses the discretion to penalize parties or attorneys engaging in frivolous conduct during civil cases. This includes arguments without legal merit or those intended primarily for the purpose of delaying proceedings.

Trump’s initial claim challenging James’ standing was deemed ‘borderline frivolous,’ and a video was later released showing James pledging to bring down Trump during her campaign for Attorney General.

Concerns have arisen over the potential bias of James, with critics pointing to her preconceived intentions to target Trump. Eric Trump raised objections, characterizing her conduct as ‘third-world prosecutorial misconduct’ and suggesting she may become the most politically corrupt Attorney General in New York history.

Trump’s legal team also contends that the documents cited in James’ lawsuit do not support her allegations of fraud.

New York’s Attorney General, Letitia James, has taken legal action against former President Donald Trump and his adult children, claiming they participated in fraudulent activities.

James alleges that the Trump Organization’s assets were artificially inflated by billions of dollars since 2011. Seeking $250 million in damages, James aims to prevent the Trumps from holding executive roles in New York-registered businesses.

James asserts that the defendants and their attorneys have repeatedly presented the same unsuccessful legal arguments during the lawsuit.

She requests a financial penalty imposed upon them, emphasizing Judge Arthur Engoron’s authority to sanction parties or attorneys involved in frivolous conduct. Engoron previously dismissed Trump’s claim that James lacked standing to file the lawsuit, considering it ‘borderline frivolous’ even during its first presentation.

Eric Trump shared a video montage showcasing James’ campaign promise to target Trump and his family when she campaigned for the Attorney General position.

He expressed concerns about the potential corruption within James’ office and criticized her conduct, describing it as ‘third-world prosecutorial misconduct.’ Trump’s legal team has argued against James’ claims, maintaining that the cited documents do not contain any fraudulent information.

Former President Donald Trump and his adult children face legal action brought forth by New York Attorney General Letitia James.

The lawsuit alleges fraudulent practices that inflated the Trump Organization’s assets over the past decade, seeking compensation of $250 million and a restriction on the Trumps’ involvement in New York-registered companies.

James cites repetitive legal arguments presented by the defendants and their lawyers, urging the judge to impose financial sanctions on them. She argues that this ongoing conduct is devoid of legal merit and intentionally prolongs the litigation process.

According to Judge Arthur Engoron, Trump’s initial claim challenging James’ standing was deemed ‘borderline frivolous.’ A video montage was later released, featuring James promising to take down Trump during her campaign for the Attorney General position.

Trump’s attorneys counter the allegations made by James, asserting that the cited documents contain no evidence of fraud. Accordingly, they have moved for the dismissal of the case based on this lack of substantial proof.