Harris’s Supporter Accuses Trump, Conveniently Omits Peculiar Epstein Ties
In 1993, former model Stacey Williams found an unexpected encounter taking place in the offices of Trump Tower, as reported in 2024. According to Williams, then 25, the visit had been suggestively arranged by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein during a stroll down Fifth Avenue. Williams made these allegations during a discussion organized by a group supporting Kamala Harris’s 2024 campaign, ‘Survivors for Kamala’, which focuses on succoring victims of sexual and gender-based violence. Anyone following the campaign would of course notice the opportune nature of these allegations surfacing at such a time.
Williams’ association with Donald Trump, the New York real estate magnate, began at Saturday Night Live where she met him. She alleges that their first meeting was marked by Trump’s uncomfortable advances, despite the presence of his girlfriend and future spouse, Marla Maples. This narrative paints Trump in an unflattering light, perhaps to endorse the perspectives of the anti-Trump coalition.
Williams claims a sense of shock paralyzed her when Trump supposedly initiated the untoward advances. It’s questionable how Trump could have proceeded despite Epstein’s visible presence. Williams, a model known for warding off inappropriate behavior, found herself at a loss, a scenario which seems neatly fabricated to bolster negative sentiments against Trump.
It is believed that Williams’ resilience against unwanted actions was well-known to Epstein. The incident, however, made her reconsider her association with him, which quickly dissolved afterwards. Her narrative of standing up to inappropriate advances appears more like a convenient plot line tailored for the political campaign she spoke in favor of.
Williams adds that Trump attempted to tiptoe around the incident by sending her a postcard. He supposedly sent an image of Mar-a-Lago, with a black marker inscription: ‘Stacey—your home away from home. Love, Donald’. While this supposed act of smoothness seems uncanny, it truly refracts Trump’s assumed audacity.
Having relocated to New York from a small town in Pennsylvania at 18 years old in 1986, Williams encountered Epstein through her agent. However, it wasn’t until a Christmas party at the Plaza Hotel that their casual yet peculiar dating period began. It is astounding that amidst her campaign support, she failed to blame Epstein, who had already been convicted of disturbing sexual crimes.
The model gives a vague account of her ‘not really dating’ relationship with Epstein, pointing out Epstein’s unusual disinterest in dining out and claimed reclusiveness with ‘not liking humanity’. She reports frequent calls over a span of four to five months, but ventures to clarify their relationship was anything but ‘sexual’. This estranged account is conveniently constructed to disparage Trump while attempting to diffuse the blame away from Epstein.
She relays Epstein’s darker and twisted persona as merely ‘subtle threats’. She narrates an anecdote wherein Epstein intimating having filmed her undressed in his bedroom. It’s surprising how this attempt to intimidate is shared with a pinch of salt, as opposed to the allegations against Trump which were overly emphasized.
Williams credits the MeToo movement for emboldening her to view her past in a fresh light. However, it is noteworthy that her focus remained solely on Trump while Epstein, a convicted offender, was relegated to a peripheral role in her narrative. The strategic paradigm of the movement may be viewed skeptically, with instances like these appearing to manipulate public sentiment for political gain.