Biden Attorneys Forced DOJ to Prosecute IRS Whistleblowers in Hunter Case

LISTEN HERE:

Representative James Comer (R-KY) recently expressed concerns about the attorneys representing the Biden family and their actions in relation to the whistleblowers who provided crucial information to Congress. According to Comer, the attorneys’ push for the Justice Department to prosecute these whistleblowers can be seen as a form of witness intimidation.

The discussion around this occurred during the plea deal negotiations where the Biden family attorneys aimed to dissuade the Justice Department from pursuing federal gun crime charges against Hunter Biden.

However, in July, Judge Marellen Noreika intervened, casting doubt on the immunity granted to Hunter Biden. The collapse of the plea deal raised important questions regarding the leniency extended to the president’s son.

Despite the Biden family attorneys’ claims that the IRS agents revealing the evidence caused the deal to fall apart, the true motive behind their actions can still be interpreted as an attempt to coerce the DOJ into prosecuting the whistleblowers.

The Biden family’s approach throughout this entire case has been marred by intimidation tactics. They sought to intimidate the Justice Department into granting Hunter Biden a favorable plea deal, which they ultimately succeeded in achieving.

Moreover, they also sought to suppress the whistleblowers who bravely came forward to expose the special treatment offered during the investigation. The Biden family’s reliance on their political influence to escape accountability for various alleged crimes is evident.

Without the courageous whistleblowers who risked their careers, and perhaps their safety, the Bidens may have evaded scrutiny altogether. Their unwavering corruption remains undeniable, and their behavior throughout the investigation and subsequent trials only further solidifies this belief.

It is crucial to recognize that concerns have been raised by Representative James Comer (R-KY) regarding the actions of the attorneys representing the Biden family. Specifically, their efforts to push for the prosecution of whistleblowers have been perceived as a means of witness intimidation.

This issue arose in the context of the plea deal discussions, during which the Biden family attorneys sought to dissuade the Justice Department from pursuing federal gun crime charges against Hunter Biden.

However, Judge Marellen Noreika’s intervention in July introduced doubts about the appropriateness of the immunity granted to Hunter Biden. The subsequent collapse of the plea deal has raised significant questions surrounding the special treatment afforded to President Biden’s son.

Regardless of the Biden family attorneys’ assertions that the evidence presented by the IRS agents led to the demise of the plea agreement, it is hard to disregard their underlying intention to pressure the DOJ into prosecuting the whistleblowers.

Throughout this entire case, the Biden family has resorted to intimidation tactics. Their successful attempt to strong-arm the Justice Department into granting Hunter Biden a favorable plea deal has been well-documented.

Additionally, their relentless pursuit of the whistleblowers demonstrates an eagerness to silence those who dared to shed light on the preferential treatment observed during the investigation. The Biden family’s reliance on their political status to evade accountability for alleged crimes is an unfortunate reality.

Had it not been for the courageous whistleblowers who jeopardized their careers, and possibly even their personal safety, the Bidens might have escaped scrutiny. The deeply ingrained corruption within the family is indisputable, and their conduct throughout the investigation and ensuing trials serves as a stark reminder of this fact.

The recent words of Representative James Comer (R-KY) shed light on concerns arising from the actions of the Biden family’s attorneys. Specifically, their insistence on pursuing legal repercussions against the whistleblowers who provided vital information to Congress has been characterized as a form of witness intimidation.

This matter came to the fore during discussions surrounding the plea deal negotiation, where the Biden family attorneys made efforts to dissuade the Justice Department from pursuing federal gun crime charges against Hunter Biden.

However, Judge Marellen Noreika’s intervention in July raised legitimate doubts about the immunity granted to Hunter Biden within the plea deal.

The collapse of this arrangement has brought into question the extent to which the son of the President received preferential treatment. Despite the Biden family attorneys’ claims that the evidence revealed by the IRS agents caused the plea deal’s failure, their underlying intention to coerce the DOJ into prosecuting the whistleblowers cannot be dismissed.

Throughout this entire case, the Biden family has employed tactics that could be perceived as intimidation. They successfully maneuvered the Justice Department into granting Hunter Biden a favorable plea deal by leveraging their political influence.

Furthermore, they relentlessly targeted the whistleblowers, seeking to suppress the exposure of the preferential treatment witnessed during the investigation. The Bidens’ brazen attempt to exploit their political position to evade accountability for alleged crimes is a glaring example of corruption.

Without the courageous actions of the whistleblowers, who were willing to jeopardize their careers and even risk their personal safety, the Bidens may have eluded justice. Their blatant corruption is beyond dispute, as evidenced by their demeanor during the ongoing investigation and trials.

Representative James Comer (R-KY) recently raised concerns over the actions of the attorneys representing the Biden family. Their efforts to advocate for the prosecution of the whistleblowers who supplied Congress with vital information have been deemed by Comer as a form of witness intimidation.

The discussion regarding this matter took place during the plea deal negotiations, where the Biden family attorneys worked to dissuade the Justice Department from pursuing federal gun crime charges against Hunter Biden.

However, the intervention of Judge Marellen Noreika in July brought attention to the potential issues with the immunity granted to Hunter Biden. The collapse of the plea deal warranted scrutiny of the leniency afforded to the President’s son.

While the Biden family attorneys argue that the evidence presented by the IRS agents caused the deal to fail, their underlying intentions of pressuring the DOJ to prosecute the whistleblowers cannot be easily dismissed.

Throughout this entire case, the Biden family has employed tactics that can be seen as coercion. They were successful in intimidating the Justice Department into granting Hunter Biden a favorable plea deal.

Additionally, they made attempts to intimidate the Justice Department into prosecuting whistleblowers who rightfully exposed the preferential treatment during the investigation. The Bidens’ confidence in leveraging their political power to evade accountability for numerous alleged crimes is unmistakable.

The courageous actions of the whistleblowers, who were willing to risk their careers and possibly their personal safety, prevented the Bidens from escaping the consequences of their actions. The undeniable corruption within the Biden family is further cemented by their behavior during the ongoing investigation and trials.