Exposed: Biden’s Deception as Chief Decision-maker

Event proceedings at the 2024 G7 Summit, specifically during the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) gathering in Apulia, Italy, were accompanied by the presence of Joe Biden. His tenure as President revealed the scandalous truth behind his power delegation choices, which came to light following a series of internal documents. These unveiled documents audaciously contradicted Biden’s insistence of being the chief decision-maker during his time in the Oval Office.

Despite engaging in a futile attempt to dispel notions of outsourcing his presidential duties, evidence points to the contrary. Claims of personal involvement in decisions related to pardons, proclamations, and executive orders have been rebutted by internal correspondences. These documents highlight the irregularities in his decision-making process, wherein important verdicts, including clemencies, were covertly assigned to others.

The existence of Biden’s intricate web of delegation was further reinforced by the known involvement of then-Vice President Kamala Harris. The remnants of the paper trail pointing towards Biden’s approval of these arrangements remain shrouded in mystery. Reports from multiple outlets indicate that the veracity of Biden’s claims of approval for such decisions holds no water.

Biden’s team started his presidency with a firm stance, ensuring their leader would provide a personal touch by manually signing all official presidential actions. However, as his reign drew to a close, the initial commitment seemed to dissipate. An internal memo unveiled the stealthy shift in this practice, revealing an abandonment of this protocol by the end of his term.

The content of the memo based on Obama-Biden precedent hinted at a concerning proposition. It proposed that as a general rule, YOU, presumably Biden, should approve and personally sign all decisions necessitating Presidential intervention. This recommendation was shared with top White House officials in February 2021.

Moving forward to February 2024, another disturbing revelation came to the forefront. Clemency actions began leaning heavily on the approval of Kamala Harris, as per a draft memo from the White House Counsel. It signified a disconcerting handover of power from the leader of the free world to his second-in-command.

Despite his overflowing timetable being cited as an excuse, this unusual delegation raised many eyebrows. The lawyers’ memo shed light on the delayed clemency package review and approval process due to Biden’s busy schedule. It was astonishing to find out that the Chief of Staff’s office became instrumental in accelerating document reviews.

The insight unveiled how vice president Harris’s approval eventually became the de facto authority for Biden’s sign-off. Such authorization was initially requested by Biden himself from the White House Counsel to discuss the pardon candidates with him. This process metamorphosed into a less transparent system, where his second-in-command’s approval was enough.

During his tenure, Biden’s clemency acts amounted to 4,245, surpassing any of his predecessors. This came at the cost of commuting sentences for individuals with illegal firearms possessions. Meanwhile, two individuals with their actions resulting in the death of a police officer also bizarrely benefited from this clemency wave. Such actions cast serious doubt over the decision-making process in the White House during Biden’s presidency.

Despite the wide-ranging questionable clemencies, the process of getting Biden’s ‘verbal approval’ seemed oddly wrapped up in four meetings between December and January. The lack of a more stringent and well-documented approval process was another cause for concern. Furthermore, the source of these discovered memos and emails raised extra questions.

The memos and emails revealed a glaring fact. Actions of Biden’s aides, who allegedly conspired to deceive the public about his mental state and unconstitutionally exercise his authorities, were under scrutiny. The internal correspondence was embroiled in an investigation targeted at unveiling the truth behind these actions.

When confronted with these allegations, a source familiar with the pardon process abnegated the outsourcing claim, sticking to a narrative favoring Biden. In their defense, they pinned the ignorance on Republicans, accusing them of not understanding the nuances of Biden’s ‘broad-based pardons’. Their statement further echoed the widespread denial prevalent in Biden’s inner circle.

Despite the vehement denials, contradictions remain abundant and suspicions are kept alive. The evidence continues to suggest that Biden’s so-called ‘individual decision making’ is a fallacy. Only a thorough investigation into these matters can truly shed light on the extent of Biden’s evasion of direct involvement in critical decisions.

While Biden’s former staff continues to emphasize his innocence, one might wonder about the rationality of such arguments. The memos and internal emails released during an explicit investigation can’t be merely brushed aside as irrelevant. The multitude of unanswered questions surrounding Biden’s time in office severs the credibility of such defenses.

The Biden presidency started off with bold promises, but the end revealed an administration struggling to maintain semblance of consistency and integrity. The ever-increasing evidence of his outsourcing key decisions, combined with Harris’s increased role in sensitive matters, sends a message starkly in contrast to the initial projection of the Biden presidency. The 2024 G7 Summit casts a shadow, adding yet another layer of skepticism to an already tumultuous period.