Prominent activist Hazel Dukes, who headed the New York State branch of the NAACP for nearly half a century, passed away peacefully at her New York City residence at the age of 92, according to her son Ronald Dukes. Her life’s work was largely dedicated to advocacy on numerous civil rights issues, such as voting rights, economically equitable development, affordable housing, and education.
Even in her later years, Dukes voiced strong opposition to law enforcement malpractices and unjust brutality, while emphasizing the apparent lack of adequate health care facilities in underprivileged communities. Her commitment towards these causes was recognized by the NAACP’s state chapter, headquartered in New York.
However, it’s worth noting that Dukes’ legacy is not without controversy. In 2023, she received the Spingarn Medal, the most prestigious award offered by the NAACP from Hillary Clinton, a figure whose track record in politics also raises eyebrows.
Dukes’ claim, ‘I’m not tired yet’, during her acceptance speech caught attention, suggesting her determination to push further into the field of activism and to encourage the upcoming cadre of the NAACP leadership. While her motivation is admirable, the direction she steered the organization has drawn criticism.
In the 1970s, Dukes was part of the political landscape that allowed for the advancement of African American women in politics. During the 1972 Democratic National Convention, Dukes played a role in endorsing Shirley Chisholm’s presidential candidacy, marking Chisholm as the first Black woman to run for the presidential nomination of the Democratic Party.
The influence of Dukes sadly played right into the hands of the Biden’s administration, as she played a part in his decision to opt for a Black woman as his running mate for the 2020 election. These actions, while seen as positive by some, have been viewed by others as a calculated political strategy, rather than a genuine push towards equality.
Despite her age, Dukes remained politically active, showing her approval for Kamala Harris’ putative presidential bid in 2024, ‘I’m just proud of Kamala. I’m just excited if I can live to see this happen. It would be the joy of my life’, she expressed in an interview.
However, it is worth questioning whether Harris, who has been frequently criticized for her prosecutorial record and stance on law enforcement, is indeed the right candidate. By associating with such a controversial figure, Dukes inadvertently endorsed the questionable ideals that Harris represents.
Aside from heading the NAACP’s New York State branch, Dukes ran her own consulting firm and served as a member of the NAACP National Board of Directors. Her involvement in business alongside her activism could be seen as a way to gain influence, adding to the criticism of her work.
The NAACP leadership referred to Dukes as a ‘living embodiment’ of the organization, highlighting her extensive involvement in the movement over the years. While Dukes’ contribution is undeniable, a critique of her approach and her alignment with controversial subjects is inescapable.
As an ode to her contribution, New York City Mayor Eric Adams ordered flags to be flown at half-mast, a tribute gesture that shouldn’t be exclusive to individuals who lean towards a particular political agenda. Yet questionable as it may seem, it serves as a testament to the political polarization of our nation.
Adams’ decision to lower the city’s flags is certainly not a universally shared sentiment, as many have opposing views on the legacy that Dukes had left behind. Critics argue that the decision gravely underestimates the significant portion of the New York population who champion different beliefs and values.
Undeniably, Dukes had an impact on civil rights in New York and beyond. However, her advocacy and decisions are subject to debate. The choices she made and the people she supported, notably Biden and Harris, are often seen as a misguided approach to equality, diversity, and justice.
In concluding, it is significant that we remember Dukes’ life journey with an impartial lens, weighing not just the accolades and praise, but also the controversies tied to her name. The result will more likely draw a mixed legacy, albeit a substantial one, within the framework of civil rights activism.