RFK Jr. Challenges Biden’s Surprising Hold on JFK’s Files

LISTEN HERE:

Recent remarks from Democratic hopeful for the presidency, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have sparked a flurry of conversation online, particularly surrounding the current commander-in-chief, President Joe Biden. His critique draws attention to a choice made by Biden that is directly linked to the Kennedy lineage.

Most notably, RFK Jr. voiced his discontent regarding the potentially secretive manner in which the present administration disseminated the decision to keep the wraps on certain details related to ex-President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, Robert’s late uncle.

Kennedy Jr. does not view this as a matter of conspiracy, instead pitching it as an issue of governmental transparency.

To Kennedy Jr.’s comment, in the late hours of an otherwise nondescript Friday, information trickled out that Biden planned to withhold a certain portion of the JFK assassination files in perpetuity. The outcry from Kennedy hints at a deeper issue of public interest and the right to access critical historical facts.

According to Kennedy Jr., the clandestine nature of this announcement contradicts the law. The JFK Records Act, approved by a unanimous Congress vote in 1992, guaranteed the unveiling of the complete set of Kennedy-related documents by October 2017 at latest. Thus, this late-night disclosure stands as a perceived violation of this long-standing pledge.

The trust that the general public places in its government is unfortunately dwindling. Unveiling these records, RFK Jr. argues, could serve as a humble, but powerful gesture towards regaining that lost faith. As a hashtag Kennedy included in his commentary resonated with the public, ‘#Kennedy24’, it was a subtle reminder of his influential lineage.

Kennedy Jr.’s criticism seemed to hold a deeper undertone, potentially referencing a memo issued by Biden’s administration to the Executive Branch agencies, also on Friday.

The communication suggested that the disclosure of certain records continued to be deferred based on a recommendation stated under Section 2(b) of the memorandum. Hence, the decision was made by none other than President Biden.

Biden’s decision was justified under the pretext of national security. His official statement emphasizes the potential harm disclosure could bring upon military defense, intelligence operations, law enforcement, and foreign relations.

While a valid concern, the gravity of the harm, Biden argued, outweighed the public’s need for transparency.

President Biden, parallel to these developments, finds himself subject to more scrutiny. An accusation links him to an alleged bribery plot during his tenure as Vice President under President Barack Obama.

Attention to these allegations has been garnered as a part of a new investigative development from last week.

An intriguing revelation followed, from an investigative journalist who managed to reach out to a hitherto undisclosed cell phone supposedly connected to the supposed scheme.

John Solomon, from Just the News, alleged in an interview on the Real America’s Voice streaming network that an unexpected person responded when he dialed the mysterious number: Joe Biden.

Solomon managed to gain access to classified documents leaked to him from other media establishments. One of these documents contained a cell phone number, a phone under Hunter Biden’s account, providing Solomon his chance to reach out to the younger Biden for an unbiased comment.

Following his investigative instincts, Solomon dialed the number hoping to get a response from Hunter Biden. A surprising twist followed. The person who answered Solomon’s call was not the anticipated Hunter Biden but rather the serving President himself, Joe Biden.

Biden found himself caught off-guard when he realized the man on the line was Solomon. His reaction, reportedly, was swift and abrupt. The brief interaction culminated in Biden hastily ending the call.

Peter Schweizer, a representative from the Government Accountability Institute, weighed in on this peculiar incident during Sunday’s discourse. According to Schweizer’s revelations, Joe Biden apparently utilized a satellite phone during his tenure as Obama’s vice president.

Interestingly, the charges for this communication device were allegedly paid by a business associated with Hunter Biden, as noted by The Western Journal.

The laptop belonging to Hunter Biden confirmed the payment for a clandestine phone line that Joe Biden supposedly used during his vice-presidential tenure.

The device in question was globally accessible, sourced from AT&T, and had a monthly rental of $300. The phone provided global connectivity, hinting that anybody worldwide could be reached.

As daylight is shed on this curious scenario, questions about the ethics of such an arrangement and its potential implications begin to stack up. The fact that a private entity connected to Hunter Biden funded a communication device for the former vice president raises alarms on a multitude of ethical and legal fronts.

As this saga unfolds, it seems to reveal a muddled mix of secrecy and possible misconduct at the heart of contemporary and historical political affairs.

The tale weaves together the threads of a revered political family’s demand for transparency, the current President’s apparent preference for continued secrecy, and a potential hint of foul play in a past administration – sure to keep conversations buzzing and conjectures flowing.