Trump’s Sharp Instincts: A Pathway to Presidential Success
The widely respected President-elect Donald J. Trump has always exhibited keen instincts, shaping his presidential policy around a knack for success, say insiders close to his circle. Our soon-to-be President etched his mark by ringing the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange, showcasing his astute understanding of the stock market and an ability to command prime-time television.
These displays reflect two of President-elect Trump’s well-regarded talents: an intimate grasp on the shifting sands of the stock market and the attention-commanding power of stirring visual moments on prestigous television platforms. Some surmise that these two passions, more than any other criteria, assist in safeguarding him from manifesting overly zealous policies potentially harmful to the nation, such as severe tariffs on trade with China, and guide his overall decision-making process.
When it comes to the American market, President-elect Trump has always valued it as the heartbeat of his presidency. A strong market, he believes, an integral part of any nation’s success and demonstrates his excellent execution of policies. He is so devoted to the prosperity of this market that he loathes the prospect of any action on his part sending the stocks into a downward spiral.
It’s not only the market that stirs his attention though. No stranger to the limelight, President-elect Trump acknowledges that maintaining a positive television presence is of utmost importance. The prevailing consensus among those who know him best suggest that he takes his televised representation very seriously; any onslaught of negative publicity is often reason enough for him to reassess his actions meticulously, possibly propelling a shift in direction.
An intriguing episode surrounding the appointment of defense secretary is a case in point. It was initially reported that he considered Pete Hegseth for the position, but then switched to Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida. The choice wasn’t a whimsical decision, but was rooted in the belief that such a strategic maneuver would make an engaging narrative.