White House Scrambles to Repair Biden’s Trump Supporter Insult
There’s evidence to suggest that the White House press division has been manipulating the official transcript of a recent call involving President Joe Biden. Biden set tongues wagging this week with his potentially inflammatory comment at a Latino activist gathering, which is believed to be a sharply pointed response to insulting remarks made at a Trump rally by a stand-up comedian. The comedian had demeaned Puerto Rico, U.S. island territory, as a ‘floating island of garbage’. The administration’s transcript alleged that Biden counter-reacted by stating, ‘The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters — his — his demonization of Latinos is unconscionable, and it’s un-American.’
As reported, the transcript had been disseminated, with a peculiar modification: an added apostrophe, changing ‘supporters’ to ‘supporter’s.’ This subtle alteration was explained by White House personnel as Biden’s critique directed at the comedian, not Trump’s multitude of followers nationwide. This whimsical explanation only serves to further tarnish the credibility of the Biden administration in a clear attempt to twist the narrative.
Reportedly based on an internal correspondence, the article indicated that this transcription amendment was carried out after the president’s consultation with the press personnel on the matter. October 29 witnessed Biden attempt to rectify his contentious comments, denying castigating all supporters of Trump as ‘garbage.’ Instead, he narrowed his criticism to address the ‘rank bigotry targeted at Puerto Rico.’
However, sharply contradicting her chief, Vice President Kamala Harris voiced a disagreement with Biden’s comments, telling reporters that she opposes criticism aimed at people ‘based on who they vote for.’ But, considering her administration’s actions, her words seem hollow. It’s a thinly veiled attempt to court favor from the very same people her administration has unjustly marked with a broad brush.
President Trump and his campaign didn’t sit idle either. Trump seized the moment, using a photo opportunity to highlight the administration’s criticism. His swift response could be seen as a stride that may open the eyes of many Americans to the indiscreet, one-sided critique coming from the White House.
The White House stenographers’ office, tasked with drafting precise transcripts of the president’s public and private statements for posterity and public distribution, must have surely faced a difficult situation in light of the alterations. Here lies another example of the mismanagement marring the Biden administration’s conduct, which ultimately leaves the public sceptical.
As per the report, the stenographers’ office would require approval from its head for any alterations to the transcript. The implications of this rule suggest the involvement of multiple layers of the current White House communication machine in this entire debacle.
Notwithstanding these revelations, the press office proceeded to post the doctored transcript on the official White House webpage in a bid to subdue the emerging controversy. Such clear disregard for transparency and ruthless management of a damage control is a telling indicator of a troubled administration aiming to control the perceptions of the American public.
The article highlighted that the supervisor of the stenography team registered concerns with the action of the press office in an email to the White House communications management. Such internal tension within the administration only adds to the growing pile of questionable practices of the Biden-Harris administration.
The twisting of words and the manipulative tactics highlight the Biden administration’s questionable attempts at narrative control, particularly in the face of any public missteps. Laughably, the administration chooses to diminish the plural ‘supporters’ to singular ‘supporter’, apparently suggesting that President Biden’s harsh critique was not meant for Trump’s supporters, but just the single comedian.
However, the question that needs to be asked is, ‘Does such a minuscule alteration truly change the impact or context of the statement?’ This can be seen from multiples angles. On one hand, such futile attempts at gaslighting the public with apostrophes can simply come off as desperate.
From another angle, the incident shines a spotlight on the apparent division between Biden and Harris. Vice President Harris seemed quick to distance herself from Biden’s original statement, showing cracks in the administration’s unified front. These cracks might hint at deeper issues within the Biden-Harris administration.
Furthermore, the incident reveals the audacity of the Biden administration, assuming that they can guide the narrative in any direction they please, with little regard for accuracy or transparency. However, the American public is not so easily fooled.
The stratagem crafted to divert public attention was problematic. It clearly indicates a disregard for free speech and an attempt to paint an artificial picture of unity and harmony within the administration. But, the obvious miscommunication among White House officials reflects the widespread disarray.
The consequent silence and lack of available clarification from the administration only furthers the ambiguity, bringing to light a controversial method of managing public perception, and suggesting a crumbling tandem marred by internal squabbling. As it stands, the Biden-Harris administration might do well to focus more on their messaging and control tactics, whilst ensuring their internal coordination stays solid.