BidenPolitics

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris: A Disastrous Tenure Overshadowed by Trump’s Success

It’s a known fact that some work capacities allow people an unusual amount of leeway when it comes to the sanctity of truthfulness. Exemplary of this is the position of a Democrat, where constant mistakes seem not only permissible but also ignored by the mass media. A glaring flaw that manages to become shockingly evident, particularly when a Democrat isn’t occupying the White House. The mainstream media has consistently danced around the truth to maintain the facade for the Democrats, a practice which was blatantly revealed during Donald Trump’s presidential tenure.

Consider the issue of Trump’s tariffs, a contentious topic that was painted by ‘expert’ opinion to be inciting international controversy and aggravating inflation. Clearly, these predictions haven’t quite lived up to their billing. Countries confronted with import tariff increases have, in fact, proceeded to renegotiate trade agreements, thereby mitigating the anticipated international catastrophe.

In context of monetary value, the tariffs implemented by Trump in July alone, have accrued a staggering $29.6 billion. The fiscal year 2025, beginning from October of the previous year, saw estimated revenues amounting to $156.4 billion. Contrastingly, inflation, which had reached remarkable levels during Biden’s governance, sunk to a four-year low recently.

Switching focus to immigration, the Democrats have made contradictory and clearly erroneous claims. They painted the picture of a ‘secure’ border under Biden’s administration, while in reality it had no real protection standards. They argued for an absolute necessity of congressional action to tackle illegal immigration, and downplayed the threat posed by undocumented immigrants.

Donald Trump’s strict stance on immigration showed its effectiveness promptly. His decision to close the southern border and enforce stringent immigration laws, along with punitive measures against illegal immigrants preying on the U.S., brought forth impressive results. Records from July 2025 show the lowest number of illegal immigration in the history of U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

In three consecutive months, not a single illegal immigrant was released within the U.S. An estimated count of 100,000 illegal immigrants was deported, apart from the ones already in detention or serving terms. It is also projected that approximately a million illegal immigrants have voluntarily left the country. This enforces the reality that strict law enforcement has actual, measurable effects.

The issue of illegal immigration is associated with the loss of jobs, an escalation in violent crimes, and a surge in human and drug trafficking. Given these dire implications, one must question Democrat policies that embolden such illegal activities. A case exemplifying this problem is the illegal immigrant from India, Harjinder Singh, who was issued a commercial driver’s license in California, despite failing the necessary English proficiency test.

Publicidad

Singh answered a mere two out of twelve questions correctly and was only able to correctly identify one road sign. In what was a direct result of his incompetency, he made an illegal left turn that led to the death of three innocent people. The question here isn’t about Singh’s punishment, but rather why was an illegal immigrant allowed to possess a commercial driver’s license in the first place.

Trump’s foreign policy actions are another bone of contention for the Democrats, who predicted a disastrous warmongering future for the U.S. This forecast couldn’t have been more off-base. In reality, Trump took the lead in resolving several international disputes, from brokering a ceasefire between Israel and Iran to resolving a border dispute between Cambodia and Thailand.

Continuing his peace-brokering streak, Trump managed to secure a commitment for a future peace treaty between Armenia and Azerbaijan. He also mediated meetings between leaders of Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, resulting in a peace agreement.

Trump’s most recent meeting with President Vladimir Putin in Alaska aimed to bring about an end to the brutal war between Russia and Ukraine. Shortly afterward, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy visited the White House. This diplomatic gathering included British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

Critics have been swift to dismiss Trump’s endeavors, pointing towards his intent to develop Gaza into a Mediterranean resort area, and his alleged failure to fully address underlying issues. However, they conveniently ignore two key pillars of Trump’s strategy. First, nations in dispute are bound to have tentative agreements initially, making them delicate. Secondly, Trump’s use of his influence and power to promote peace should be applauded.

Wouldn’t a president focused on sparking entrepreneurship and driving economic development be preferable over one engaged in ‘nation-building’, covert operations, and selling immense amounts of weaponry, which only further destruction and death while making arms manufacturers extremely rich?

Democrats have been consistently misguided about Trump’s policy initiatives, and it’s apparent they are fully aware of their errors. They appear to protect multinational corporations, surveillance, ‘rights’ of illegal immigrants and criminals more than the rights of the American citizens, workers, and families. This skewed priority list has stripped them of an economic message and plunged them deeper into a crisis.

Publicidad

Longtime Democratic strategist James Carville was rendered speechless on Fox News when asked about the positions of notable Democratic Party politicians like Bill and Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris, and Gavin Newsom. Carville ended up indulging in empty rhetoric about the future fortunes of the Democrats in 2026 and 2028, without specifying any mechanism or candidate.

It’s clear that even long-serving Democrats like Carville are without an explanation for the dismal state of their party, unable to advocate for a single policy platform from the Democratic National Committee. This speaks volumes about the questionable convictions held by the Democratic party and their inability to explain or justify them.

Ad Blocker Detected!

Refresh