Laura Gillen Takes Credit for $500K in Long Island Funding Despite Voting Against Final Bill
Long Island Democratic Rep. Laura Gillen is facing criticism after touting $500,000 in federal funding for a local fire department and library even though she voted against the final spending package that delivered the money.
Gillen recently announced that the Floral Park Fire Department would receive $250,000 toward the purchase of a new fire truck. Another $250,000 was secured for the Franklin Square Public Library, bringing the total funding highlighted by the congresswoman to half a million dollars.
The Democrat celebrated the fire department funding as an example of her work bringing federal dollars back to Long Island. She said the new equipment would help first responders protect residents and pledged to continue fighting for federal money for communities in her district.
The funding, however, was ultimately included in a consolidated appropriations package that Gillen voted against when the legislation came up for final passage earlier this year.
Gillen had supported an earlier version of the spending package. That version later collapsed following opposition from Senate Democrats over Department of Homeland Security funding, leading lawmakers to continue negotiations before another version was brought forward.
When the legislation that ultimately became law reached the House for the decisive vote in February, Gillen voted against it. The $500,000 she subsequently promoted for the Long Island projects was contained within that final package.
Gillen’s office defended her decision to take credit for the money, arguing that securing individual community projects involves significantly more work than simply voting on the larger spending bill. Her team said she helped the Floral Park Fire Department and Franklin Square Public Library prepare their applications and worked to move the requests through the congressional appropriations process.
Republican Jeanine Driscoll, who is challenging Gillen for her House seat, accused the Democrat of misleading voters by celebrating funding contained in legislation she ultimately opposed. Driscoll argued that Gillen should not claim credit for money provided through a bill she voted against.
The controversy is not the first time Gillen has faced criticism over the issue. She was previously accused of taking credit for nearly $1 million in federal firefighting money associated with another government funding package she opposed.
Members of both parties have faced similar accusations over the years, particularly when lawmakers oppose massive spending packages while supporting individual projects contained within them. Gillen maintains that she was directly responsible for shepherding the Long Island requests through Congress, while Republicans argue her final vote tells a different story.
The dispute is now providing fresh ammunition for Republicans as Gillen fights to hold her competitive Long Island congressional seat. With $500,000 in local funding at the center of the controversy, her opponent is attempting to turn what Gillen presented as a legislative accomplishment into a question about her voting record and political credibility.
