in

Biden Successor Harris Fails to Defend Against Trump’s Comeback

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS - AUGUST 22: (L-R) Second gentleman Doug Emhoff, Democratic presidential nominee, U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris, Democratic vice presidential nominee Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minnesota first lady Gwen Walz celebrate after Harris accepted the Democratic presidential nomination during the final day of the Democratic National Convention at the United Center on August 22, 2024 in Chicago, Illinois. Delegates, politicians, and Democratic Party supporters are gathering in Chicago, as current Vice President Kamala Harris is named her party's presidential nominee. The DNC takes place from August 19-22. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

In the aftermath of Donald Trump’s surprise victory over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election, hearsay of electoral interference bubbled up across the nation. Yet the tide drastically changed when Joe Biden claimed a dramatic win over Trump in the 2020 elections. Ironically, it was the incumbent, President Trump himself, who propagated accusations of widespread fraud without any concrete evidence. This unfounded claim catalyzed the shocking events of January 6, leading to a staggering number of criminal cases against him.

Indeed, by the time former Vice President Kamala Harris stepped into the ring to challenge Trump in the 2024 presidential election, she seemed to be bracing herself for potential foul play. But in spite of the perceived momentum on Harris’ side, and the cloud of numerous felony convictions looming over Trump, he managed to reclaim the presidency against all odds.

However, Trump’s return to the white house was not free from controversy. A non-profit organization in Wisconsin soon launched legal action against renowned entrepreneur, Elon Musk, alleging that he had provided underhanded support during Trump’s 2024 campaign. Musk, along with his America PAC and an affiliated organization known as United States of America Inc., were accused of violating state election laws through what the plaintiffs characterized as an audacious ploy to bribe the people of Wisconsin to cast their votes.

The cornerstone of the complaint lay in the actions executed by Musk leading up to the state’s 2024 Supreme Court elections. The complainers argued that Musk had waved million-dollar checks in front of voters and his PAC had promised cash rewards to those who signed petitions and disclosed personal details. According to them, this was a clear contravention of Wisconsin’s law which prohibits offering anything of value over one dollar to entice someone to vote or to vote for a particular candidate. Further, they claimed that these actions trespassed upon the state’s laws against unauthorized lotteries.

Prior to the grand giveaway happening in Wisconsin, state attorney general, Josh Kaul, launched a lawsuit against Musk and his America PAC, accusing them of violating laws that prohibit enticing people to vote. Despite these allegations, the attempts to halt the event in its tracks were fruitless. A county judge failed to take immediate action, an appeals court dismissed all further motions, and the state Supreme Court refused to hear the case.

Sponsored

Trump’s unexpected victory in the 2024 elections was met with hushed skepticism, particularly given his own provocative statements that raised concerns about election integrity. During a gathering soon after the election, Trump attributed a decisive win in one of the battleground states to Musk’s tech savviness, suggesting an undue influence. Trump’s remarks seemed to suggest Musk’s technical expertise had a role to play in manipulating the vote-counting computers, which tipped the scale in his favor in Pennsylvania.

And it wasn’t only Wisconsin that experienced Musk’s excessive financial influence. Similar extravagant tactics were employed in other crucial states throughout the 2024 election. In Pennsylvania, for instance, Musk pledged a daily lottery sum of one million dollars for those participating in his PAC’s petition drive. What’s more, participants stood to gain extra money for successful referrals. Prosecutors in Pennsylvania attempted to halt this campaign, but their efforts were thwarted by a judge who ruled they had failed to prove the initiative was an illegal lottery. Therefore, it was allowed to continue undisturbed on Election Day.

The central purpose of the latest complaint lodged in Wisconsin was to thwart Musk and his accomplices from reusing these dubious methods in forthcoming elections. There seems to be a hint that Musk himself may indeed reduce his political expenditure, although he has intentionally left room for future political ventures. In fact, he recently cut ties with the Trump administration.

Meanwhile, the alliance between Musk and those Republicans allied with Trump appears to be deteriorating. Musk’s recent call for the establishment of a new political party, along with his accusations of lawmakers betraying voters by supporting Trump’s legislative priorities, points to growing tensions.

On top of it, issues are cropping up in places like Rockland County, New York. This longtime Democratic stronghold witnessed an unusual situation where Democrats came out on top in several races but Kamala Harris secured almost no votes. This oddity has stoked further fear about the legitimacy of Trump’s 2024 triumph and the extent of interference in key states.

On the surface, the electoral process seems to be marred by a host of disconcerting allegations and unpredictable outcomes. Yet for all the high stakes and ordid details, the insidious nuance pervading every story paints a dark picture of a system in disarray.

The individuals and entities under scrutiny, including but not limited to Musk, present a fascinating case study in this narrative. Viewed from afar, their actions raise questions about the very integrity of the democratic process, and underscore the urgent need for resolute reforms.

In these uncertain times, all eyes remain on these unfolding developments. While the full extent of these issues is yet to be determined, it is clear that the American political landscape is undergoing a season of intense examination and upheaval.

To be sure, the country finds itself on the precipice of significant change. As allegations and court cases continue to emerge, the verdict on the 2024 elections lingers in the balance. And with every passing day, the fate of democracy hangs ever more precariously in the balance.