in ,

Biden’s Aides Use Fifth Amendment to Cover Up His Health Crisis

Joe Biden’s senior aides have sought refuge in the Fifth Amendment in a congressional inquiry probing the alleged concealment of the former president’s cognitive decline. Senior figures in close interaction with Mr. Biden, now 82, have conspicuously chosen to exercise their right against self-incrimination before the House of Representatives’ oversight committee.

One such individual is Annie Tomasini, who previously served as the White House deputy chief of staff. She recently emerged as the newest figurehead to plead the Fifth, seemingly in a bid to insulate herself from any potential legal pitfalls. Her move aligned with those of Anthony Bernal, the chief of staff to the former first lady Jill Biden, and Kevin O’Connor, Mr. Biden’s personal physician, both of whom also decided to opt for silence last week.

James Comer, the Republican chair of the oversight committee, was noticeably distressed with the developing series of evasion. He termed the pattern of Biden associates shielding themselves as an attempt to escape potential criminal liability for the suspected conspiracy. He voiced his disbelief on Friday, stating that it was outrageous for Tomasini and others to refuse to answer basic queries about Mr. Biden’s ability to serve.

Comer expressed his deep concern involving the startling reluctance of these aides in offering clear answers. He emphasized their inclination to bury pertinent information and protect their own interests and that of Joe Biden from being scrutinized. This omission, he emphasized, was a stark betrayal of the American population’s trust.

The Republicans are determined to push forward with their quest for transparency and accountability. Comer assured that they would continue to pursue the truth and actively explore different means to acquire the necessary answers. This commitment came in response to the increasingly secretive approach Biden’s staff members appeared to adopt.

Sponsored

Some Biden aides have consented to testify of their own accord; others are being coerced via subpoena. Yet others still are in the process of contemplating the option to plead the Fifth, as reported by The Washington Post. This development came after Republicans decided to probe into the mental agility of Mr. Biden during his tenure as president.

The rationale behind the investigation is attributed to the release of the book ‘Original Sin’, authored by CNN’s Jake Tapper and Axios’ Alex Thompson. Its publication ignited substantial controversy by revealing allegations of a clique of aides intent on concealing Mr. Biden from public examination.

In an unprecedented disclosure, the book revealed that while serving as president, Biden was known to forget the names of aides whom he had associated with for decades. Furthermore, it suggested that he was ‘protected’ by advisers during official cabinet meetings, generating a sense of dismay and concern.

Speculations about Biden’s deteriorating health shaped a larger narrative in the backdrop of his 2024 presidential campaign. The authors of ‘Original Sin’ claimed that the staff had seriously contemplated using a wheelchair for Mr. Biden seemingly due to his increasingly noticeable physical decline.

One particularly damning revelation about Biden’s physical status came from his physician Kevin O’Connor. He is said to have privately stated his concerns about the possible requirement of a wheelchair in case of another disconcerting fall from Mr. Biden. This further fueled skepticism about the depths of the issues concealed beneath the political surface.

It was alleged that Biden’s physical deterioration, especially apparent in his unsteady gait, had ignited internal debates about transitioning him to wheelchair assistance. However, these discussions were reportedly postponed until after the election, underlining once again the lengths his aides would go to, in their bid to preserve his political image.

The complexity of these revelations presents an illuminating examination into the concealing tactics exercised by Biden’s closest aides. Unapologetic in their determination, they seem to prioritize the preservation of a manufactured reality over the essential duty of being transparent to the American people.

Unfortunately, the real loser in this scandal appears to be the American people. The lack of truthfulness and apparent manipulation by Biden’s closest aides, based on these allegations, indicate an unsettling trend in contemporary politics, raising fundamental questions about the state of democracy and its gatekeepers.