Biden’s Mystery: Another Staffer Takes the Fifth

Anthony Bernal, who served in the troubled Biden administration, has become the latest member to use the Fifth Amendment as a safety net. Last week, this measure of self-protection was similarly employed by former White House physician Kevin O’Connor. Bernal, once a symbol of Biden’s administration, has now chosen to hide behind the Fifth when questioned regarding former President Biden’s perceived cognitive decline.

The enquiries come from the House Oversight Committee, a body now tasked with investigating the nebulous cloud surrounding former president’s mental fitness. Under this probing, Bernal resorted to silence, evidencing the murky waters of the previous administration. Incredibly, Bernal, who was equally known for being former First Lady Jill Biden’s senior adviser, is one of many who preferred to stay mute than comment on the situation.

Adding to the intrigue, Bernal was summoned for a confidential deposition on Wednesday. This came as the latest development after he failed to show up for an agreed-upon interview in the month prior. The slapdash approach to accountability has left more questions than answers for the Oversight Committee.

During the short-lived deposition, Bernal decided to invoke the Fifth Amendment, refusing to comment on the inquiries made by House staffers. A source, unveiling the underbelly of the debacle, confirmed this to Fox News. Such avoidance tactics, though legal, are nonetheless indicative of a disquieting lack of transparency.

His insistence on remaining silent becomes more alarming when viewed in the light of him being the second former Biden White House staff to take refuge in the Fifth. Last week, the ex-White House physician, Kevin O’Connor, found himself in a similar position. The chronic invocation of the Fifth by two erstwhile Biden staffers forces us to question the picture they are trying so hard not to paint.

The purpose of the House Oversight Committee’s probe is to unveil any potential cover-ups regarding Biden’s health while he was in office. Given Biden’s questionable use of an autopen for vital government processes like pardons and commutations, this investigation is both warranted and necessary. The unsettling silence from key figures continues to heighten the mystery.

The question remains: What are they hiding, and why? As the House Oversight Committee continues to pull back the curtain, one can only hope the truth will finally come to light. The contemptuous silence from former appointed officials throws a dour shadow over Biden’s presidency.

Past and current actions, full of evasion and absence, underline one thing: Biden’s administration was not the beacon of light it promised to be. As the Committee’s pursuit grows stronger, the public’s faith in the established order continues to wane. One can only wonder what other secrets Biden’s fleeting reign managed to conceal.

Attempts to seek out the truth have been met with a wall of silence, faced by a number of former Biden staffers. This raises serious questions about the integrity and transparency of the past administration. Is this the democracy we were promised?

The investigation into Biden’s administration spirals into an array of unanswered questions. Or perhaps more accurately, questions purposively left unanswered. A lack of straightforwardness, especially on matters of national concern, belittles the power of the democratic system.

The right to silence, often sought as a shield against self-incrimination, seems to have become a favorite aegis of Biden’s erstwhile officers. It is intriguing, alarming, and worthy of deep reflection. Just what could have led to this? One wonders if they’re mocking the very democracy they vowed to uphold.

Clarity remains out of reach, and the steadfast faith in transparency remains a far-off dream. This veil of secrecy draped by Biden’s administration and his staffers over something as significant as a President’s physical and mental acuity is unsettling. It makes a mockery of the people’s right to know and tarnishes the image of open governance.

The saga of ducking and diving, of evading the glaring spotlight, of wrapping themselves in Fifth Amendment protections — it’s disheartening. With each passing moment, the narrative is bleaker for Biden’s legacy. It underscores an ominous pattern, a precedent that leaves an indelible imprint on the annals of political history.