Reports had previously surfaced indicating the usage of narcotics by Elon Musk during his campaign, a claim he firmly denounced and asserted was a fabrication by the media. However, this vehement rebuttal failed to convince the Head of State, who reportedly painted Musk as a substance user in conversations that trailed their internet-based spat.
Fast-forward to the present where Musk feels compelled to vindicate himself publicly, regarding something he didn’t do, according to him. His proof? He shared an image of a drug screening result on social media platforms. Posted during unconventional hours, the documented evidence was from a test for an assortment of drugs, all of which Musk tested negative for.
The image revealed the sample was taken nearly two weeks after the day of the purported incident. Musk’s commentary on the post was quite succinct as he posted, quite simply, lol. Allegations had previously arisen hinting at Musk resorting to varied drugs and raised concerns among his upper management regarding such usage.
The legal representative for Musk reassured outlets stating Musk was under routine and unanticipated drug tests and had yet to record a failed test. Insiders acquainted with the situation shared that Musk was tipped off before the tests were conducted.
This news unfolded just prior to Musk’s decision to resign, an action that instigated a mad dash to bring back many of the personnel who’d be let go. The story also set the scene for an impending digital spat between Musk and the President.
In the heated exchange between the two, Musk levelled accusations at the president, alleging his involvement in Epstein’s affair. Musk later took to social media to express his remorse over some of his comments towards the president, acknowledging they overstepped boundaries.
Coverage responding to Musk’s disclosure of his drug test results retorted, Elon Musk’s public outbursts are a consequence of his dissatisfaction with our investigative coverage. None of his subsequent remarks or evidence contradict our initial reporting about his drug use during his campaign. We remain confident about the integrity of our journalism.
In other news, the Government is contemplating revising the prohibition on the remaining asbestos variant used within the United States. This reconsideration could freeze enforcement of the ban over the next several years. For health advocates who’ve spent decades advocating for the ban of this cancer-inducing mineral, it’s a significant setback.
Identified as white asbestos, this substance, associated with lung cancer and mesothelioma, is prohibited in more than 50 countries. Despite the risks, white asbestos continues to be imported for its use in an array of applications such as roofing materials, textiles, and cement within the United States.
Additionally, it is also found in automobile components like clutches, brake pads, seals, and other parts, and plays a role in the manufacturing of chlorine. Last year, an official ban on white asbestos was announced.
However, the current administration plans to put a hold on its implementation as it reviews the policy, a process projected to span approximately two and a half years. The stance by the administration on this critical health issue has sparked concern and drawn criticism from safety and health advocates who’ve been waging a decades-long war against the detrimental substance.