RKJ’s Shocking Call for Alternative Measles Treatments

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the present Secretary of Health and Human Services, appears to be introducing steps that may destabilize public health. Just recently, he commanded his department to initiate a hunt for alternative healing methods for measles. This is currently on the rise nationwide and the decision has baffled many medical professionals and epidemiologists who are acutely aware of the high efficiency of the measles vaccine.

This decision was suddenly announced soon after Kennedy disclosed that the department will start insisting on testing all proposed vaccines against placebos during the trial phase. This needless and elongate requirement is also deemed unjust to the participants of the trial. It was only a short while ago that measures for novel treatments for measles were redundant as the illness had been deemed eliminated in the US approximately 25 years ago.

The elimination of this illness did not occur by chance and it was not a result of concocted alternative treatments that were crafted in secretive places or disseminated in online forums. The disease was effectively conquered because thorough pharmaceutical research was conducted and considerable public investment was made. This resulted in the development of a highly efficient and long-term therapy – the vaccine.

This vaccine was eventually paired with immunizations to other diseases, leading to the creation of the MMR vaccine. Consequently, an extremely infectious disease – more contagious than diseases such as COVID, spreading on average to nearly 90% of unprotected individuals that a measles patient comes into contact with – was virtually obliterated in the United States.

But as recent developments unfortunately show, this is no longer the case. It’s more than slightly amusing that advocates for anti-vaccine measures support the concept of innate immunity when vaccines are fundamentally engineered to provoke the human body’s own immune response to foreign agents, priming it to produce the appropriate antibodies in a manner that is significantly safer than acquiring the live infection itself.

A question that often arises is whether getting measles can ultimately assist a person in building resistance to the virus. While the answer is, it could. It might also, however, prove fatal, and, even if survival ensues, there could be lasting harm. What’s notable about measles is its propensity to adversely affect the body’s overall immune response.

Individuals, once infected, are not only grappling with measles but also find themselves at a disadvantage in fighting off other harmful agents, including those they previously developed some resistance to. People must confront the hard truth that mortality is a grim reality, with a potentially substantial number of individuals at risk due to RFK Jr.’s pursuit to revert our joint proficiency in managing the spread of what were seemingly resolved widespread diseases.

Without a doubt, the current climate in public health causes tremendous concern. The search for alternate treatments for a seemingly eradicated disease like measles raises questions about the decisions being made at the highest levels of healthcare administration.

Furthermore, the call for running placebo trials along with every vaccine proposal is seen not only as a futile and lengthy process but also an unethical one. Such steps could potentially delay the delivery of crucial vaccines to the public and compromise the health and wellbeing of the trial participants.

The measles vaccine, on the other hand, stands as a triumph of meticulous pharmaceutical research backed by generous public funding. This successful intervention has saved countless lives over the years and significantly alleviated the public health burden associated with measles.

Indeed, the creation of the MMR vaccine, which combines immunizations for measles, mumps, and rubella, marked an enormous stride forward in disease prevention. Today, we are faced with the daunting realization that such hard-won progress may come unravelled because of a reckless disregard for facts and proven science.

The measles infection poses dual risks: an immediate threat from the disease itself and the subsequent compromise of the immune system it triggers, making the individual susceptible to other diseases. This double jeopardy makes measles a sinister adversary and underscores the importance of maintaining our collective preventive measures.

At this critical juncture, it is paramount that public health policies continue to be guided by solid scientific evidence and robust research, rather than unfounded theories or individual whims. The potential human toll of an unchecked spread of measles reinforces the urgency of maintaining our collective defenses against these once defeated diseases.