Santa Monica Resident Arrested for Targeting ICE Lawyer: A Stern Warning Against Doxxing
In what seems to be a stern warning against harassment and doxxing, a resident of Santa Monica has been apprehended by federal authorities. Allegedly, Gregory Curcio targeted an attorney from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This move is meant to serve as a cautionary tale for individuals harboring similar intentions.
If proven guilty, Curcio could be staring down the barrel of a five-year prison sentence. The accusatory statement from the Department of Justice indicate he had maliciously revealed private or identifying details about an ICE lawyer.
Immigration officers, according to the commander of Operation ‘At Large’, can be reassured that targeting by individuals like Curcio will not be tolerated. The announcement sends a resounding message, warning against the sharing of law enforcement agents’ private details, and clarifying that imposed charges will mirror those faced by Curcio.
Adding an amplified layer to this warning was the U.S. Attorney for Central California, Bill Essayli. He pointed to Curcio’s arrest as an illustration of the necessity for ICE agents to protect their identities.
However, this stance now contradicts a newly-enacted law in California which prohibits law enforcement from concealing their identities. Essayli, critical of those opposing federal agents’ decision to maintain anonymity during public operations, expressed his belief firmly.
He communicated in uncertain terms that any form of harassment – whether carried out online or physically – towards federal law enforcement would not be permitted. Measures will be employed to apprehend those found guilty of disclosing personal information of federal agents or their relatives.
According to the Justice Department, Curcio was taken into custody at the onset of the week. The following day, he was presented in front of a federal judge in Los Angeles, who ordered his detention without bond pending his arraignment in October.
Allegedly, back in February, Curcio had shared online the residential address of an ICE attorney and encouraged the internet fraternity to ‘SWAT’ her, a term used to describe making a false emergency call that elicits a response from armed law enforcement.
The targeted ICE lawyer, in her statement to the police, shared that she hadn’t ever crossed paths with Curcio. However, she recollected him residing in a property owned by her mother and suggested that he had begun harassing her mother as early as January of 2024.
The Office of Responsibility at ICE has also launched an investigation into the matter. At a parallel timeline, California’s Governor had authorised a law that prevents most law enforcement personnel from hiding their faces during official undertakings.
This move was interpreted as a direct rebuttal to the raids, leading to considerable backlash from liberal circles while being lauded by conservatives. The event even garnered attention from the highest office in the country.
This momentous event was followed by the President federalising the California National Guard, additionally deploying resources to the country’s second-largest city. This stark speaking point marked an important chapter in this continual narrative concerning law enforcement, identity protection, and the balance of power.