Wikipedia Labels ‘Adult Human Female’ as Hate Speech, Links It to Trump-Era ‘Persecution’
Wikipedia is once again under fire for its escalating left-wing bias, this time for claiming that the phrase “adult human female” is hate speech. The term, a straightforward biological definition of a woman, is now treated by the site’s editors as a “dog whistle” for so-called transphobia. Even more disturbing, it’s been linked to claims of “persecution” during President Donald Trump’s second term.
The article was created by a longtime Wikipedia editor who openly brags about attacking Trump and his supporters. That same editor, operating under the handle “Tataral,” has also smeared Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, criticized Ed Martin for probing Wikipedia’s bias, and tried to delete the entry for Bari Weiss’s media company, the Free Press.
Tataral’s “adult human female” article labels the phrase a weapon of the “gender-critical” movement — a term Wikipedia editors use to vilify feminists and conservatives alike. The introduction calls it a “trans-exclusionary” slogan and claims it’s used to deny transgender individuals’ existence. The article even ties the phrase to Trump’s executive order protecting female athletes and prison inmates from being forced to compete or bunk with biological men.
This article is now embedded in hundreds of other Wikipedia entries thanks to its inclusion in a navigation box linked to Trump’s presidency. That means users searching completely unrelated topics will be fed the narrative that “adult human female” is part of a broader campaign of hate.
This wasn’t just a rogue edit. After the page was created, other left-wing editors, including “Aquillion” and “MjolnirPants,” piled on by adding vague references and weak sources that supposedly back the claim that the phrase is hate speech. None of the sources cited actually declare the phrase as such — a fact pointed out by editors trying to remove the content, only to be overruled repeatedly. One editor even cited that it was “very obviously” hate speech, ignoring Wikipedia’s own sourcing rules.
Worse still, the same network of editors has been attempting to redefine basic questions like “What is a woman?” as rhetorical traps rather than legitimate inquiries. Pages are frequently locked down so only a handful of ideologically aligned editors can control the language.
Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales recently defended the site on Channel 4 News, claiming that anyone calling it “woke” was misinformed. He pointed out that the site defines “woman” as “adult female human.” What he didn’t acknowledge was that an entirely separate article exists just to attack that definition — the one now being used as a weapon to discredit Trump and conservatives.
That article is linked directly to a separate entry titled “Persecution of transgender people under the second Trump administration,” also created by Tataral. That page accuses Trump of trying to erase trans people’s existence and even draws comparisons to Nazi Germany. It frames the former president’s biological protections for women and girls as a kind of genocide.
This kind of political editing has become routine at Wikipedia, especially when it comes to LGBT issues. Earlier this year, editors banned a user for refusing to use “tree” as a pronoun. Another editor faced sanctions for quoting the Bible in a private Discord channel. Wikipedia’s front page even promoted a public gay sex park. This is the same site schoolkids are told to trust for research.
Despite Wales’s PR spin, Wikipedia’s ideological slant is clear. It’s not just woke — it’s militant, coordinated, and increasingly dangerous to free thought. When the definition of a woman is declared hate speech, and saying “adult human female” is portrayed as persecution, it’s no longer an encyclopedia. It’s a political weapon.